Publication details

Taxonomic, phylogenetic, and functional composition and homogenization of residential yard vegetation with contrasting management

Authors

PADULLES CUBINO Josep CAVENDER-BARES Jeannine GROFFMAN Peter M. AVOLIO Meghan L. BRATT Anika R. HALL Sharon J. LARSON Kelli L. LERMAN Susannah B. NARANGO Desiree L. NEILL Christopher TRAMMELL Tara L. E. WHEELER Megan M. HOBBIE Sarah E.

Year of publication 2020
Type Article in Periodical
Magazine / Source Landscape and Urban Planning
MU Faculty or unit

Faculty of Science

Citation
Web https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103877
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103877
Keywords SPECIES RICHNESS; GLOBAL PATTERNS; PLANT TRAITS; URBAN; URBANIZATION; DIVERSITY; FRAMEWORK; FLORAS; CONSEQUENCES; ECOLOGY
Description Urban biotic homogenization is expected to be especially important in residential yards, where similar human preferences and management practices across environmentally heterogeneous regions might lead to the selection of similar plant species, closely related species, and/or species with similar sets of traits. We investigated how different yard management practices determine yard plant diversity and species composition in six cities of the U.S., and tested the extent to which yard management results in more homogeneous taxonomical, phylogenetic, and functional plant communities than the natural areas they replace or than relatively unmanaged areas at the residential-wildland interface ("interstitial" areas). We categorized yards based on fertilizer input frequency and landscaping style: high-input lawns, low-input lawns, and wildlife-certified yards. We defined homogenization as decreased average beta-diversity and decreased variance in alpha-diversity in yards when compared to natural and interstitial areas. We found that all residential yard types regardless of their management were functionally more homogeneous for both alpha- and beta-diversity than the natural and interstitial areas. Nevertheless, wildlife-certified yards were functionally more similar to natural areas than lawn-dominated yard types. All yard types were also more homogeneous in phylogenetic alpha-diversity compared to natural and interstitial areas, but more heterogenous in taxonomic alpha-diversity. Within yards, taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity were weakly correlated, highlighting the importance of examining multiple dimensions of biodiversity beyond taxonomic metrics. Our findings underscore the ecological importance of gardening practices that both support biodiversity and create residential plant communities that are functionally heterogeneous.

You are running an old browser version. We recommend updating your browser to its latest version.

More info