Publication details

Comparison of clinical outcomes and safety of catheter ablation for atrialfibrillation supported by data from CT scan or three-dimensional rotationalangiogram of left atrium and pulmonary veins

Authors

LEHAR František STÁREK Zdeněk JEŽ Jiří NOVÁK Miroslav WOLF Jiří ŠTĚPÁNOVÁ Radka KRUŽLIAK Peter KULÍK Tomáš ŽBÁNKOVÁ Alena JANČÁR Radek VÍTOVEC Jiří

Year of publication 2015
Type Article in Periodical
Magazine / Source Biomedical Papers of the Faculty of Medicine of Palacký University
MU Faculty or unit

Faculty of Medicine

Citation
Web http://biomed.papers.upol.cz/artkey/bio-201504-0017_comparison_of_clinical_outcomes_and_safety_of_catheter_ablation_for_atrial_fibrillation_supported_by_data_from.php
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.5507/bp.2014.040
Field Cardiovascular diseases incl. cardiosurgery
Keywords atrial fibrillation; catheter ablation; electrophysiology; three dimensional rotational atriography; computed tomography; imaging; left atrium
Description Background. Catheter ablation in the left atrium has become a common therapeutic strategy in the management of atrial fibrillation (AF). The high degree of success and safety profile of this procedure is dependent on precise knowledge of the true anatomy in the chamber. This information is imported mostly from cardiac computed tomography. A novel method for imaging the left atrial anatomy is three-dimensional rotational angiography (3DRA). Methods. The aim of our study was to the compare clinical outcome and safety of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation guided by 3DRA vs. conventional CT scan. One hundred and twenty-five patients referred for AF catheter ablation at St. Anne's University Hospital Brno were included in the retrospective analysis of clinical outcome within the first year after the procedure. Results. There was a close correlation in overall procedural parameters between the groups. The frequency of recurrent episodes of AF (24% in CT-guided group vs. 27% in 3DRA-guided group, P=0.721) as well as the onset of atypical atrial flutter after the procedure (10% vs. 8%, respectively, P=0.731) were similar in both groups. No difference in the number of patients necessitating repeat ablation (5% vs. 5%, P=0.984) was found. Procedural complications of ablations guided by 3DRA were comparable with those guided by CT (2% vs. 3%, respectively, P=0.568). Conclusion. 3DRA has proven to be a safe and simple method for imaging the left atrium and guiding catheter ablation for AF. This approach is anticipated to become a new standard in 3D reconstruction of the left atrium.

You are running an old browser version. We recommend updating your browser to its latest version.

More info