Publication details

Comparing XRISM Cluster Velocity Dispersions with Predictions from Cosmological Simulations: Are Feedback Models Too Ejective?

Authors

AUDARD Marc AWAKI Hisamitsu BALLHAUSEN Ralf BAMBA Aya BEHAR Ehud BOISSAY-MALAQUIN Rozenn BRENNEMAN Laura BROWN Gregory V. CORRALES Lia COSTANTINI Elisa CUMBEE Renata DIAZ TRIGO Maria DONE Chris DOTANI Tadayasu EBISAWA Ken ECKART Megan E. ECKERT Dominique EGUCHI Satoshi ENOTO Teruaki EZOE Yuichiro FOSTER Adam FUJIMOTO Ryuichi FUJITA Yutaka FUKAZAWA Yasushi FUKUSHIMA Kotaro FURUZAWA Akihiro GALLO Luigi GARCIA Javier A. GU Liyi GUAINAZZI Matteo HAGINO Kouichi HAMAGUCHI Kenji HATSUKADE Isamu HAYASHI Katsuhiro HAYASHI Takayuki HELL Natalie HODGES-KLUCK Edmund HORNSCHEMEIER Ann ICHINOHE Yuto ISHI Daiki ISHIDA Manabu ISHIKAWA Kumi ISHISAKI Yoshitaka KAASTRA Jelle KALLMAN Timothy KARA Erin KATSUDA Satoru KANEMARU Yoshiaki KELLEY Richard KILBOURNE Caroline KITAMOTO Shunji KOBAYASHI Shogo KOHMURA Takayoshi KUBOTA Aya LEUTENEGGER Maurice LOEWENSTEIN Michael MAEDA Yoshitomo MARKEVITCH Maxim MATSUMOTO Hironori MATSUSHITA Kyoko MCCAMMON Dan MCNAMARA Brian MERNIER Francois MILLER Eric D. MILLER Jon M. MITSUISHI Ikuyuki MIZUMOTO Misaki MIZUNO Tsunefumi MORI Koji MUKAI Koji MURAKAMI Hiroshi MUSHOTZKY Richard NAKAJIMA Hiroshi NAKAZAWA Kazuhiro NESS Jan-Uwe NOBUKAWA Kumiko NOBUKAWA Masayoshi NODA Hirofumi ODAKA Hirokazu OGAWA Shoji OGORZALEK Anna OKAJIMA Takashi OTA Naomi PALTANI Stephane PETRE Robert PLUCINSKY Paul PORTER Frederick S. POTTSCHMIDT Katja SATO Kosuke SATO Toshiki SAWADA Makoto SETA Hiromi SHIDATSU Megumi SIMIONESCU Aurora SMITH Randall SUZUKI Hiromasa SZYMKOWIAK Andrew TAKAHASHI Hiromitsu TAKEO Mai TAMAGAWA Toru TAMURA Keisuke TANAKA Takaaki TANIMOTO Atsushi TASHIRO Makoto TERADA Yukikatsu TERASHIMA Yuichi TSUBOI Yohko TSUJIMOTO Masahiro TSUNEMI Hiroshi TSURU Takeshi TUEMER Ayseguel UCHIDA Hiroyuki UCHIDA Nagomi UCHIDA Yuusuke UCHIYAMA Hideki UEDA Shutaro UEDA Yoshihiro UNO Shinichiro VINK Jacco WATANABE Shin WILLIAMS Brian J. YAMADA Satoshi YAMADA Shinya YAMAGUCHI Hiroya YAMAOKA Kazutaka YAMASAKI Noriko YAMAUCHI Makoto YAMAUCHI Shigeo YAQOOB Tahir YONEYAMA Tomokage YOSHIDA Tessei YUKITA Mihoko ZHURAVLEVA Irina CUI Weiguang ETTORI Stefano GRAYSON Skylar HEINRICH Annie MCCALL Hannah NELSON Dylan OKABE Nobuhiro OMIYA Yuki SARKAR Arnab SCANNAPIECO Evan SUN Ming TANAKA Keita TRUONG Nhut WIK Daniel R. ZHANG Congyao ZUHONE John

Year of publication 2025
Type Article in Periodical
Magazine / Source ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
MU Faculty or unit

Faculty of Science

Citation
web https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/2041-8213/ae100c
Doi https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ae100c
Keywords Hydrodynamical simulations; Galaxy clusters; Intracluster medium; High resolution spectroscopy
Description The dynamics of the intracluster medium (ICM), the hot plasma that fills galaxy clusters, are shaped by gravity-driven cluster mergers and feedback from supermassive black holes (SMBHs) in the cluster cores. XRISM measurements of ICM velocities in several clusters offer insights into these processes. We compare XRISM measurements for nine galaxy clusters (Virgo, Perseus, Centaurus, Hydra-A, PKS 0745–19, A2029, Coma, A2319, and Ophiuchus) with predictions from three state-of-the-art cosmological simulation suites, TNG-Cluster, the Three Hundred Project GADGET-X, and GIZMO-SIMBA, that employ different models of feedback. In cool cores, XRISM reveals systematically lower velocity dispersions than the simulations predict, with all 10 measurements below the median simulated values by a factor of 1.5–1.7 on average and all falling within the bottom 10% of the predicted distributions. The observed kinetic-to-total pressure ratio is also lower, with a median value of 2.2%, compared to the predicted 5.0%–6.5% for the three simulations. Outside the cool cores and in non-cool-core (NCC) clusters, simulations show better agreement with XRISM measurements, except for the outskirts of the relaxed, cool-core cluster A2029, which exhibits an exceptionally low kinetic pressure support (<1%), with none of the simulated systems in either of the three suites reaching such low levels. The NCC Coma and A2319 exhibit dispersions at the lower end but within the simulated spread. Our comparison suggests that the three numerical models may overestimate the kinetic effects of SMBH feedback in cluster cores. Additional XRISM observations of NCC clusters will clarify if there is a systematic tension in the gravity-dominated regime as well.
Related projects:

You are running an old browser version. We recommend updating your browser to its latest version.

More info