Publication details
Rodinná mediace po novele ZŘS: proč (zatím) neomezovat poskytování jen na zapsané mediátory
| Title in English | Family Mediation Following the Amendment to the Act on Special Judicial Proceedings: Why We Should Not (Yet) Limit the Provision of Mediation Services to Registered Mediators |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Year of publication | 2026 |
| Type | Article in Periodical |
| Magazine / Source | PRÁVNÍ ROZHLEDY |
| MU Faculty or unit | |
| Citation | |
| web | URL |
| Keywords | family mediation; mediator; custody proceedings |
| Description | This article examines whether it is justified to restrict family mediation to licensed mediators only. Based on an analytical and normative approach and an overview of current practice, it demonstrates that such exclusivity would not lead to higher service quality but, on the contrary, would limit its accessibility, flexibility, and opportunities for interdisciplinary collaboration. The text emphasizes that a more appropriate direction is to strengthen quality standards across all providers and to support accessible services for families. |