Publication details
Metabolic disease variants rewire gene regulation through disruption of DNA G-quadruplex structures
| Authors | |
|---|---|
| Year of publication | 2026 |
| Type | Peer-reviewed scientific article |
| Magazine / Source | GENOME BIOLOGY |
| MU Faculty or unit | |
| Citation | |
| web | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-026-04147-2 |
| Doi | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-026-04147-2 |
| Keywords | G-quadruplex; Disease-associated SNVs; Metabolic disease; Cancer risk; Transcription factors; Alternative promoters; PDAL-seq |
| Description | Background The global prevalence of metabolic diseases (MetDs) continues to rise and is associated with an increased cancer risk. Genome-wide association studies have identified numerous single nucleotide variants (SNVs) linked to MetDs, some within genes also implicated in tumorigenesis. G-quadruplexes (G4s) are non-canonical DNA secondary structures that regulate gene expression in diverse and context dependent ways. Variants affecting G4 structure may alter transcriptional efficiency. Notably, disease-associated variants are frequently located within or near regulatory elements and may overlap with cancer-associated alternative promoters. Results We systematically assess the overlap between MetD-associated SNVs and G4 motifs, and evaluate their effects on G4 stability, topology, and their potential to modulate the regulatory activity of G4s in alternative promoters. Approximately 0.9% to 1.6% of MetD-associated SNVs are located within G4 motifs (G4-SNVs), depending on the prediction tool. Effect alleles, those associated with risk or protection against MetDs, generally reduce G4 stability, regardless of their direction of association. Several G4-SNVs are mapped to cancer-associated alternative promoters, including the destabilizing MICB rs2855804 C/T variant and the stabilizing PLA2G6 rs2277844 G/A variants. In vivo G4 formation is confirmed by permanganate/S1 nuclease footprinting coupled with sequencing, while circular dichroism spectroscopy reveals allele-specific changes in G4 topology and stability. Integration of Hi-C data, histone modifications, transcription factor binding, and luciferase reporter assays further support their regulatory impact. Conclusions Although G4-SNVs are unlikely to be the sole disease drivers, they significantly influence transcriptional regulation, potentially contributing to allele-specific gene expression in MetD patients and their link to increased cancer risk. |