Informace o publikaci

The Role of Quasi-Logical Arguments in Critical Dialogue: A Pragma-Dialectical Redefinition

Autoři

SVAČINOVÁ Iva

Rok publikování 2017
Druh Článek v odborném periodiku
Časopis / Zdroj Informal Logic
Fakulta / Pracoviště MU

Filozofická fakulta

Citace
www http://ojs.uwindsor.ca/ojs/leddy/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/4468/4063
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.22329/il.v37i1.4468
Obor Filosofie a náboženství
Klíčová slova Critical Dialogue; New Rhetoric; Pragma-Dialectics; Probability; Quasi-logical Arguments
Popis The article focuses on the New Rhetoric’s concept of quasi-logical arguments imitating logical or mathematical demonstrations, and examines it from point of view of pragma-dialectics as a device contributing towards resolving the difference of opinion. It is shown that the category of quasi-logical arguments cannot be considered as an argument scheme or a united type of strategic maneuvering. It is suggested to consider the category of quasi-logical arguments as a cluster of specific strategic maneuvers increasing the efficiency of arguments under certain circumstances. This approach is demonstrated in a case study of pragma-dialectical analysis of the quasi-logical scheme of probability.
Související projekty:

Používáte starou verzi internetového prohlížeče. Doporučujeme aktualizovat Váš prohlížeč na nejnovější verzi.

Další info