Informace o publikaci

Cost-of-illness analysis and regression modeling in cystic fibrosis: a retrospective prevalence-based study

Autoři

MLČOCH Tomáš KLIMEŠ Jiří FILA Libor VÁVROVÁ Věra SKALICKÁ Veronika TURNOVEC Marek KRULIŠOVÁ Veronika JIRČÍKOVÁ Jitka ZEMKOVÁ Dana VILIMOVSKÁ DĚDEČKOVÁ Klára BÍLKOVÁ Alena FRÜHAUFOVÁ Vladimíra HOMOLA Lukáš FRIEDMANNOVÁ Zuzana DRNEK Radovan DŘEVÍNEK Pavel DOLEŽAL Tomáš MACEK Milan

Rok publikování 2017
Druh Článek v odborném periodiku
Časopis / Zdroj EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS
Fakulta / Pracoviště MU

Lékařská fakulta

Citace
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10198-015-0759-9
Obor Veřejné zdravotnictví, sociální lékařství
Klíčová slova Cystic fibrosis; Cost-of-illness; Disease severity; Health care costs; FEV1; Generalized linear model
Popis Economic data pertaining to cystic fibrosis (CF), is limited in Europe generally, and completely lacking in Central and Eastern Europe. We performed an analysis of all direct costs associated with CF relative to key disease features and laboratory examinations. A retrospective prevalence-based cost-of-illness (COI) study was performed in a representative cohort of 242 CF patients in the Czech Republic, which represents about 65 % of all Czech CF patients. Medical records and invoices to health insurance companies for reference year 2010 were analyzed. The mean total health care costs were a,notsign14,486 per patient, with the majority of the costs going towards medicinal products and devices (a,notsign10,321). Medical procedures (a,notsign2676) and inpatient care (a,notsign1829) represented a much smaller percentage of costs. A generalized linear model showed that the strongest cost drivers, for all cost categories, were associated with patient age and lung disease severity (assessed using the FEV1 spirometric parameter), when compounded by chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa airway infections. Specifically, maximum total costs are around the age 16 years; a FEV1 increase of 1 % point represented a cost decrease of: 0.9 % (medicinal products), 1.7 % (total costs), 2.8 % (procedures) and 7.0 % (inpatient care). COI analysis and regression modeling using the most recent data available can provide a better understanding of the overall economic CF burden. A comparison of our results with other methodologically similar studies demonstrates that although overall costs may differ, FEV1 can nonetheless be utilized as a generally transferrable indicator of the relative economic impact of CF.

Používáte starou verzi internetového prohlížeče. Doporučujeme aktualizovat Váš prohlížeč na nejnovější verzi.

Další info