Informace o publikaci

Whose Public Reason? Which Justification of Laws? A Natural Law Response

Logo poskytovatele
Název česky Čí veřejný rozum? Jaké ospravedlnění zákonů? Odpověď přirozeného práva
Autoři

BAROŠ Jiří

Rok publikování 2021
Druh Článek v odborném periodiku
Časopis / Zdroj Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale
Fakulta / Pracoviště MU

Fakulta sociálních studií

Citace
www https://www.cairn.info/revue-de-metaphysique-et-de-morale-2021-4-page-507.htm
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/rmm.214.0507
Klíčová slova common good; disagreement; liberalism; new theory of natural law; perfectionism; political liberalism; natural law; public justification; public reason
Popis A persistent puzzle for practical philosophy centres on finding the appropriate path to justify the laws whose purpose is to regulate the functioning of constitutional democracies. Public reason liberals deny that this justification could come from comprehensive doctrines, since the laws must be justifiable to all (reasonable) citizens. The natural law tradition offers a useful test of the plausibility of this claim. This article illustrates how the two versions of public reason liberalism differ in their openness to natural law reasons, and why, given the influence of their disparate starting points on the normative standards by which they assess laws, natural law exponents have good reason to reject both.
Související projekty:

Používáte starou verzi internetového prohlížeče. Doporučujeme aktualizovat Váš prohlížeč na nejnovější verzi.

Další info