Informace o publikaci
Xact625i vs. PX-375: a comparative study of online XRF ambient multi-metal monitors vs. ICP-MS
| Autoři | |
|---|---|
| Rok publikování | 2025 |
| Druh | Článek v odborném periodiku |
| Časopis / Zdroj | Atmospheric Measurement Techniques |
| Fakulta / Pracoviště MU | |
| Citace | |
| www | https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/18/7021/2025/ |
| Doi | https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-7021-2025 |
| Klíčová slova | X-RAY-FLUORESCENCE; TRACE-ELEMENTS; AEROSOL; PARTICLES; APPORTIONMENT; TRANSPORT; POLLUTION |
| Přiložené soubory | |
| Popis | This study provides a comprehensive evaluation of the Xact625i and PX-375 online energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence (ED-XRF) instruments for real-time trace elemental monitoring at a rural background site over six months. This represents the first direct comparison between the two instruments, assessing their performance against inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), the reference method for elemental analysis. Both instruments demonstrated strong measurement capabilities, with the Xact625i achieving higher sensitivity for trace metals and showing closer agreement with ICP-MS using 24 h averaging of 2 h data (r2=0.89 vs. 0.78 for the PX-375). The PX-375 reported higher overall concentrations, primarily due to overestimations of Si and S. Both instruments correlated well for Ca, Fe, Zn, and Pb, while detection limits affected Ni and Cd. The Xact625i exhibited superior performance in measuring elements such as S, V, and Mn. While correlations with ICP-MS were high, systematic over- and underestimations in absolute concentrations were found, particularly for the PX-375. When directly comparing the two online instruments using raw 2 h data, a strong agreement was observed (mean r2=0.95). However, systematic slope discrepancies persisted, in line with comparisons against ICP-MS. The findings confirm the reliability of these two ED-XRF instruments for high-time-resolution elemental monitoring as a complementary technique to traditional filter analysis, enabling detailed source apportionment studies, improved trend analysis, and more responsive air quality management strategies. Future work comparing ED-XRF to laboratory-based methods could refine harmonisation efforts and address systematic differences in absolute concentrations. |