Informace o publikaci
Functional limitations of glomalin-related soil protein as an indicator of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi while remaining relevant to soil health
| Autoři | |
|---|---|
| Rok publikování | 2026 |
| Druh | Článek v odborném periodiku |
| Časopis / Zdroj | SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY |
| Fakulta / Pracoviště MU | |
| Citace | |
| www | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038071725003700 |
| Doi | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2025.110076 |
| Klíčová slova | Glomalin; Arbuscular mycorrhiza; Bradford assay; Immunoassay; Soil health; Soil organic matter |
| Přiložené soubory | |
| Popis | This review critically examines the chemical nature of Glomalin-related soil proteins (GRSP), the biases introduced by non-mycorrhizal sources, and emphasizes the need to avoid misinterpreting GRSP as an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) marker. GRSP have been widely used in agricultural science as indicators of soil health and as a quantitative indicator of the accumulation of decomposed biomass of AMF in soil. GRSP is typically extracted by repeated autoclaving of soil in a citrate buffer, followed by protein quantification using the Bradford assay. However, recent discussions on the composition, structure, and interpretation of GRSP raise concerns about its specificity as an AMF marker, and we have serious doubts about the protein dominance of this mixture. A key limitation is that conventionally measured GRSP concentrations also correlate with plant litter decomposition and organic matter inputs, indicating that GRSP reflects general organic accumulation rather than AMFspecific processes. This underscores the need for more direct and representative measurements of mycorrhizal interactions. To address this issue, we propose renaming GRSP as Bradford-reactive soil compounds (BRSC), a term that more accurately reflects the chemical heterogeneity of the fraction and avoids implying any specific association with AMF. |