Publication details

Prospective randomized comparison of the transobturator mid-urethral sling with the single-incision sling among women with stress urinary incontinence: 1-year follow-up study

Authors

JURÁKOVÁ Michaela HUSER Martin BELKOV Atanas-Ivan JANKŮ Petr HUDEČEK Robert ŠTOURAČ Petr JARKOVSKÝ Jiří VENTRUBA Pavel

Year of publication 2016
Type Article in Periodical
Magazine / Source International urogynecology journal
MU Faculty or unit

Faculty of Medicine

Citation
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2895-2
Field Gynaecology and obstetrics
Keywords Stress urinary incontinence; Mid-urethral sling; Single-incision sling ; Efficacy; Patient-reported outcomes; Randomized controlled trial
Description Introduction and hypothesis The objective was to compare the efficacy and safety of an innovative single-incision sling (SIS) with the inside-out transobturator sling (TOT) in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Methods A prospective randomized trial was performed in a tertiary referral urogynecology center from January 2012 to December 2013. The study included women with pure urodynamic SUI. Patients were randomized to either the SIS or the TOT anti-incontinence procedure. Surgery duration, blood loss, and groin pain scores were recorded for each patient. The 1-year follow-up visit included objective and subjective cure parameters, postoperative de novo urgency, complications, and the impact on the patient’s life quality.

You are running an old browser version. We recommend updating your browser to its latest version.

More info