Publication details

Challenging the view that invasive non-native plants are not a significant threat to the floristic diversity of Great Britain

Authors

HULME Philip PAUCHARD Anibal PYŠEK Petr VILA Montserrat ALBA Christina BLACKBURN Tim BULLOCK James CHYTRÝ Milan DAWSON Wayne DUNN Alison ESSL Franz Sebastian GENOVESI Piero MASKELL Lindsay MEYERSON Laura NUNEZ Martin PERGL Jan PESCOTT Oliver POCOCK Michael RICHARDSON David ROY Helen SMART Simon ŠTAJEROVÁ Kateřina STOHLGREN Thomas VAN KLEUNEN Mark WINTER Marten

Year of publication 2015
Type Article in Periodical
Magazine / Source Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A.
MU Faculty or unit

Faculty of Science

Citation
Web http://www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1506517112
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1506517112
Field Ecology
Keywords alien species; Great Britain; impact
Description Conservation scientists and practitioners have long recognized that not all non-native species pose a threat to biodiversity, yet some ecologists still fail to grasp this message (1). The conclusions drawn by Thomas and Palmer (2) that non-native plant species are not a threat to floral diversity in Britain highlight how this lack of understanding can lead to inappropriate analyses and misleading inferences regarding the impacts of non-native species. Thomas and Palmer base their conclusions on an analysis of the Countryside Survey (CS): this valuable dataset depicts large-scale vegetation changes in common habitats, but its stratified random design does not provide a comprehensive assessment of the impacts of non-native plant species on native biodiversity.

You are running an old browser version. We recommend updating your browser to its latest version.

More info