Publication details

Immunizations as Rules Violations

Authors

ONDRÁČEK Tomáš

Year of publication 2019
Type Appeared in Conference without Proceedings
MU Faculty or unit

Faculty of Economics and Administration

Citation
Description Boudry and Braeckman (2011) regard immunizing strategies as arguments. I will argue against and show that (A) immunizing strategies are not arguments and (B) they are instead violations of rules of (critical) discussion. I will (A) show problems with analyses of examples using the Toulmin model of argument, and I will (B) show that the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation can explain each type of immunizations as violations of particular rules of critical discussion.

You are running an old browser version. We recommend updating your browser to its latest version.

More info