Publication details

Story-telling in Judicial Discourse



Year of publication 2011
Type Article in Periodical
Magazine / Source Comparative Legilinguistics
MU Faculty or unit

Faculty of Law

Field Law sciences
Keywords narrative; judicial discourse; judicial decision making; legal language; argumentation
Description Judicial discourse and the style of written judicial decisions has been subject of numerous analyses. Judicial discourse comprises different elements from formal and structural ones to various modes of argumentation used. Narrative – when approached as a form or a structure – may be helpful in thorough analyses of judicial discourse, in particular the texts of judgements. This paper analyzes one judgement of a Czech court by means of narrative analysis and tackles the issues of narrative differentiation, narrative structure and narrative coherence in relation to judicial decision-making. Furthermore, it addresses the issue of story-telling and its importance within judicial discourse.
Related projects:

You are running an old browser version. We recommend updating your browser to its latest version.

More info