You are here:
Publication details
With or without Automaticity: Interference and Negative Priming Effects as Indicators of (Lacking) Convergent Validity in Two Computerized Stroop-like Tasks
| Authors | |
|---|---|
| Year of publication | 2017 |
| Type | Appeared in Conference without Proceedings |
| MU Faculty or unit | |
| Citation | |
| Description | Although significant interference and negative priming effects could be observed in two Stroop-like tasks regardless of the level of asymmetry (i.e. varying degree of automaticity) in target vs. distractor processing, these effects were unrelated across the tasks, suggesting a lack of convergent validity in tasks that are typically used interchangeably. |