Publication details
Rechtsschutzauftrag oder Rechtsstaatlichkeitskriterium? Zum Bedeutungswandel des Art. 19 EUV in der Rechtsprechung des EuGH
| Title in English | Mandate of Legal Protection or Criterion of the Rule of Law? On the Change of Meaning of Art. 19 TEU in the Case Law of the ECJ |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Year of publication | 2023 |
| Type | Article in Periodical |
| Magazine / Source | Der Staat : Zeitschrift für Staatslehre, öffentliches Recht und Verfassungsgeschichte. |
| MU Faculty or unit | |
| Citation | |
| Web | |
| Doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.3790/staa.62.1 |
| Keywords | judicial indpendence; Rule of Law; locus standi; CJEU; access to court |
| Attached files | |
| Description | The Lisbon Treaty imposed on Member States the duty and the task of ensuring effective judicial protection. This mandate has been transformed during the last few years into a measure of judicial independence and thus into an instrument for solving the EU's rule of law crisis. However, this substantive view is very narrow, neglects the procedural obstacles and is therefore one-sided. This article highlights the formal and informal hurdles in enforcing these newfound standards of judicial independence and emphasises that access to the court - as a part of effective judicial protection - is a precondition for any assessment of judicial independence. |
| Related projects: |