Publication details
A multi-country evaluation of healthcare professionals' experiences with the PanCareFollowUp training package to implement person-centred care in childhood cancer survivorship care: A PanCareFollowUp study
| Authors | |
|---|---|
| Year of publication | 2026 |
| Type | Peer-reviewed scientific article |
| Magazine / Source | SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER |
| MU Faculty or unit | |
| Citation | |
| web | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00520-026-10930-5 |
| Doi | https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-026-10930-5 |
| Keywords | Person-Centred Care; Cancer Survivorship Care; PanCareFollowUp; Implementation |
| Description | PurposeSurvivors of childhood, adolescent, and young adult (CAYA) cancer face lifelong risks of treatment-related late effects, emphasizing the need for innovative, person-centred survivorship care. The PanCareFollowUp (PCFU) Care intervention, based on person-centred care (PCC), prioritizes survivors' values and needs. This paper describes the evaluation of experiences of healthcare professionals' (HCPs) and supporting staff's experiences with the training package that was developed for implementation of PCC in the PCFU Care.MethodsTo support PCC delivery, a training package, including a training presentation with voice-over and a workshop, was developed. Healthcare professionals (HCPs) and supporting staff from four European survivorship clinics evaluated the training package through questionnaires measuring readiness to apply PCC, knowledge, confidence, perceived utility, and tool-related experiences.ResultsEighteen HCPs evaluated the training presentation. Readiness to apply PCC increased from 68% pre-training to 89% post-training, while confidence declined from 78% to 68%. Most participants reported improved knowledge, with 94% indicating at least some increase. Frameworks such as Ekman's pillars, the seven steps for a PCC consultation, and shared decision-making questions were rated highly useful. Twenty-eight HCPs evaluated the workshop; 82% found it useful and 82% reported an overall favourable impression. Participants valued open discussion, multidisciplinary perspectives, and survivor involvement. The workshop's short duration and more broadly, limited time, staff shortages, and digital infrastructure were identified as barriers to PCC implementation.ConclusionThis multi-country evaluation shows that even brief PCC training can enhance HCPs' readiness to deliver person-centred survivorship care. The findings highlight both the potential of concise educational interventions and the importance of delivery format and organizational context for the sustainable implementation of PCC across survivorship care settings. |