Informace o publikaci

Teze o přelití v participativní demokracii: Empirická relevance a normativní udržitelnost

Autoři

ČAMBORA Jan DUFEK Pavel

Rok publikování 2016
Druh Článek v odborném periodiku
Časopis / Zdroj Politologická revue
Fakulta / Pracoviště MU

Fakulta sociálních studií

Citace
www http://search.proquest.com/docview/1869481968?accountid=16531
Obor Politologie a politické vědy
Klíčová slova spillover; Carole Pateman; Workplace Democracy; Participatory Democracy; Deliberative Democracy
Popis The paper focuses on the “spillover thesis” which constitutes a pillar of much of contemporary participatory democratic theory; specifically, we assess the claim that workplace democratization leads to a higher degree of political participation amongst labourers. The paper analyses the thesis as formulated by Carole Pateman, including its later revisions triggered by ambiguous results of empirical studies aiming to (dis)prove it. The spillover thesis is then confronted with important methodological and theoretical critiques, the upshot being that in order to be able to arrive at determinate conclusions, more carefully designed empirical studies are needed. Normatively speaking, however, blame can always be laid on the wider environment of market economy and/or representative democracy, to the effect that the spillover thesis is both difficult to disprove and radically subversive. Given the recent dominance of deliberative democratic theory which incorporates a strong participatory element, we finally discuss whether a recent innovation – namely, the concept of deliberative systems – could be fruitfully employed as a flexible umbrella-type framework for the spillover thesis and the participatory ideals related to it.
Související projekty:

Používáte starou verzi internetového prohlížeče. Doporučujeme aktualizovat Váš prohlížeč na nejnovější verzi.

Další info