Informace o publikaci
Multidimensional meta-argumentative analysis of disagreements – selected case studies
| Autoři | |
|---|---|
| Rok publikování | 2023 |
| Druh | Další prezentace na konferencích |
| Fakulta / Pracoviště MU | |
| Citace | |
| Popis | In this paper we propose a method which allows for multidimensional metaargumentative representation of public debates. The model involves deontic, ontological, and ethical aspects. These three axes determine the crucial dimensions of the discussion, which are brought about by relevant questions. Ontological axis is focused on the questions concerning facts (“Is X the case?”). Ethical axis captures concerns about ethical and moral standpoints regarding a given issue (“Is X good or fair or just?”). Deontological axis represents practical reasoning in the sense that it is focused on actual doings of parties (“Should X be done?”). Their intersections represent issues being considered within the discussion, each of which may be approached from one of these three perspectives. We reconstruct the public debate in the tree-like structure representing the meta-level of argumentation. The point of departure is the time-line of events concerning a given topic. Nodes of the resulting tree-like structure are questions, representing the consecutive issues being considered. The rationale for a question to appear in the structure is based either on the relation of dependency between questions or on the presence of an appropriate external nonlinguistic feeder (action or event). We will illustrate such analyses with case studies of the Turów mine dispute (between Poland and Czech Republic) as well as the debates concerning the so-called Lex Czarnek (educational reform) and the abortion law changes in Poland. |