Informace o publikaci
Long-term implant survival, functional, and radiological assessment of cemented stem in revision hip arthroplasty
| Autoři | |
|---|---|
| Rok publikování | 2025 |
| Druh | Článek v odborném periodiku |
| Časopis / Zdroj | INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS |
| Fakulta / Pracoviště MU | |
| Citace | |
| www | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00264-025-06526-z |
| Doi | https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-025-06526-z |
| Klíčová slova | Revision total hip arthroplasty; Cemented femoral stem; Implant survival; Radiographic assessment; Harris hip score |
| Popis | Purpose Revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) is an increasingly common procedure due to the growing number of primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) performed worldwide. This study evaluates the long-term implant survival, functional outcomes, and radiographic performance of cemented femoral stem (Beznoska s.r.o., Kladno, Czechia) in rTHA. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 183 patients who underwent rTHA with cemented stem between March 2012 and December 2023. The mean follow-up duration was 71.26(+/- 39.31) months. Implant survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, and failure modes were assessed. Radiographic changes were classified using the Gruen Zones system. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the Harris Hip Score (HHS). Cox proportional hazard models were applied to identify prognostic factors influencing implant survival. Results The five-year implant survival rate was 98.1%, declining to 83.9% at twelve years. The overall failure rate was 3.83%, with periprosthetic infection (4 cases) being the most common cause, followed by aseptic loosening (2 cases). Radiographic changes were observed in 24.03% of cases, predominantly in Gruen Zones 2, 6, and 1. Functional outcomes were favorable, with a mean HHS of 81.28(+/- 5.74), comparable to outcomes reported for uncemented revision stems. Age, stem diameter, and stem length did not significantly impact implant survival. Conclusion The cemented stem demonstrated favourable long-term survival, with high implant retention rates. Functional outcomes indicated overall satisfactory performance. Radiographic evaluation revealed localized changes around the implant, predominantly in Gruen Zones 2, 6, and 1. Implant failure was relatively rare, with periprosthetic infection being the most common cause. |