Informace o publikaci
Tackling Disinformation Through Public Administration Recommendations – The Czech Experience1
| Název česky | Boj s dezinformacemi prostřednictvím doporučení veřejné správy – české zkušenosti |
|---|---|
| Autoři | |
| Rok publikování | 2024 |
| Druh | Článek v odborném periodiku |
| Časopis / Zdroj | Central European Public Administration Review |
| Fakulta / Pracoviště MU | |
| Citace | |
| www | odkaz na text článku na webových stránkách časopisu |
| Doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.17573/cepar.2024.2.08 |
| Klíčová slova | administrative justice; non-binding act; public administration; recommendation; rule of law; soft law |
| Přiložené soubory | |
| Popis | The aim of this paper is to critically evaluate the practice of public administration, in which it influences the addressees of public administration not through classical forms of public administration (e.g. administrative decisions) but by issuing recommendations to third parties, who then carry out regulatory interventions. The paper employs qualitative research methodology and a case study approach, focusing on the analysis of the specific situation in the Czech legal environment (including existing case law), which it frames as a broader issue that can be replicated and thus requires a more general solution. The text critiques the conclusion drawn from the Czech administrative court case law, which holds that public administration recommendations, if not legally binding, are not subject to judicial review. This conclusion suggests, at first glance, that public administration recommendations are an activity that has no legal limits. However, this interpretation is challenged in particular from the perspective of the rule of law. Specifically, the regulatory model outlined above, where public administration (the state) achieves its objectives by influencing third parties, raises concerns. |
| Související projekty: |